The Illinois General Assembly sent pension reform legislation
to Governor Pat Quinn in March in an effort to stabilize the state’s
hemorrhaging pension fund and prop up the state budget. Governor Quinn expects
the reforms to save $300 million in the coming year and “billions more in the
years to come.”
For a Limited Time receive a
FREE Compensation Market Analysis Report! Find out how much you should be paying to attract and retain the best applicants and employees, with
customized information for your industry, location, and job.
Get Your Report Now!
House Bill 1946 applies only to state workers hired after
January 1, 2011, creating a two-tier benefit system. The bill increases the
retirement age to 67 for workers with 10 years of service. Workers who have at
least 10 years of service may retire at age 62 with reduced benefits. It also
limits annual increases in payouts to 3 percent or half the rate of inflation,
whichever is less, and sets a cap on the amount of benefits one worker can
receive.
The state’s public pension fund is underfunded by some $62.4
billion, making it the least solvent fund in the nation. As a result, the
state’s bond rating was downgraded in the past year, a fact that helped to spur
swift passage of the legislation.
“In this historical fiscal crisis, we must act responsibly,”
Illinois Senator Donne Trotter (D) said. “These savings will help protect and
stabilize our pension systems and relieve budget pressures in the future.”
Governor Quinn said he would sign the legislation, calling it
“an important and vital step toward rescuing Illinois from fiscal calamity.”
Reaction. State
Representative Jim Durkin (R) called the bill “less than perfect” but said that
it was “the only option” presented to the Legislature.
Illinois Senator Dale Righter (R) said that he “wasn’t happy”
about the bill, noting that it allows Chicago schools to defer payments to the
fund for 3 years and increases cost of living allowances for legislators and
judges. “We need reform that makes all the necessary changes, just not some
changes,” Righter said. “While this bill does make meaningful changes to the
state pension system, it does it in the same old way by raiding pensions to
fill our budget gaps.”