Whether a deduction is permissible or impermissible will
depend on the facts in the particular case. The general rule is to
stick to company policy and heed the list of permissible and nonpermissible
deductions below. Remember, the FLSA does not regulate vacation, severance,
sick (but see below), and holiday pay or rest and meal times. Most
of these are a matter of company policy and should be enforced in
a nondiscriminatory manner. As a general rule, employers should err
on the side of caution when it comes to deducting exempt personnel.
If an exempt employee abuses the company's policy on work time, employers
cannot dock their pay. Instead, point out the policy and discipline
the employee accordingly.
State law. In addition,
be aware that many state laws do regulate areas that the FLSA
does not. In these cases, the state law would control.
Personal reasons. Deductions may
be made when the employee is absent from work for a full day or more
for personal reasons other than sickness or disability. Thus, if employees
are absent for a day or longer to handle personal affairs, their salaried
status will not be affected if deductions are made from their salary
for such absences. If employees are absent for less than a day, they
must be paid for the full day.
It is important to note that employers may deduct from
an employee's allotted personal time under the company's leave plan
in increments of less than a day. The employer simply may not deduct
an employee's pay for less than a day's absence.
Sickness/disability. Deductions also may be made for absences of a full day or more occasioned
by sickness or disability (including industrial accidents) if the
deduction is made under a bona fide plan, policy, or practice of providing
compensation for loss of salary caused by both sickness and disability.
Similarly, if the employer operates under a state or private sickness
and disability insurance law, deductions may be made for a day or
longer if benefits are provided under the particular law or plan.
In the case of work-related accidents, the “salary basis” requirement
will be met if the employee is compensated for loss of salary in accordance
with the applicable workers' compensation law or the plan adopted
by the employer, provided the employer also has some plan, policy,
or practice of providing compensation for sickness and disability
for non-work-related accidents.
Sickness and disability deductions are an area of confusion
for some employers. It is important to distinguish between deducting
from an exempt employee's paycheck and deducting from an employee's
allotted sick time. The employer may not deduct from an employee's
pay for less than a day's absence for sickness or disability. But,
if an employer, for example, provides an employee with 2 weeks of
paid sick time by company policy and the employee has used up all
of their sick time, an employer may deduct from the employee's paycheck
in full-day increments if the employee is out for a day or more. If
the employee works for any part of a day, though, and is out sick
the remainder of the day, the employer may not deduct from the employee's
paycheck.
On the other hand, employers may deduct from an
employee's allotted sick time under the company's leave plan in increments
of less than a day as long as the employee has not used up their paid
sick time.
When the sickness/disability
deduction applies. An employer may make a deduction from
an exempt employee's salary for the employee's full-day absences due
to sickness provided the deduction is made in accordance with a bona
fide plan, policy, or practice of providing wage replacement benefits
for such absences. Deductions may also be made for the exempt employee's
full-day absences due to sickness before the employee has qualified
for the plan, policy, or practice or after the employee has exhausted
the leave allowance under the plan. For example, an employer's sick
leave plan provides each employee with 10 paid sick days per year.
An employee must work for the employer for 90 days before becoming
eligible for the sick leave benefit. In this example, a deduction
of 1 or more full days may be made from the salary of an exempt employee
who is absent due to sickness:
• Before the employee becomes eligible to participate in
the sick leave plan (i.e., in the initial 90 days of employment);
• After the employee has exhausted the 10-day leave entitlement
under the sick leave plan; and
• When the employee receives compensation according to
the employer's sick leave plan. In this case, the employee would most
likely not see a reduction in pay, but rather, the employee's sick
leave benefit would be reduced by the number of days the employee
was absent due to sickness and for which compensation from the plan
was received.
Family and Medical Leave Act
(FMLA) leave. Employers may dock the pay of otherwise salaried
and exempt employees for family and medical leave-related absences
of less than 1 full day without affecting their exempt status but
only in situations where the employer is required to provide leave
under the FMLA.
Please see the
national Leave of Absence
section.
Safety penalties. Suspensions imposed in good faith for infractions of significant
safety rules will not affect the employee's salaried status. Significant
safety rules include only those relating to the prevention of serious
danger to the plant or other employees, such as rules prohibiting
smoking in explosives plants, oil refineries, and coal mines.
First and last week of employment. An exempt employee's salary may be docked during the first and last
week of employment if the employee works less than a full workweek.
Payment of a proportional amount of the employee's salary for the
time actually worked meets the salary pay requirement for those weeks.
Disciplinary suspensions. Deductions from the pay of exempt employees may be made for unpaid
disciplinary suspensions of 1 or more full days imposed in good faith
for infractions of workplace conduct rules. The employer must have
a written policy applicable to all employees in order to do this.
For example, an employer may suspend an exempt employee without pay
for 3 days for violating a generally applicable written policy prohibiting
sexual harassment or workplace violence.
No work available. If the employee is ready, willing, and able to work, deductions
may not be made for time when work is not available.
Caused by employer
or operations of business. No deductions may be made from
the employee's compensation for time lost caused by the employer or
by the operating requirements of the business. During office closures
due to inclement weather, disasters, or by the operating requirements
of the business, a private employer may direct exempt staff to take
vacation or leave bank deductions without jeopardizing the employees’
exempt status. There is no prohibition on an employer giving vacation
time and later requiring that the vacation time be taken on specific
days. However, an employee will not be considered a salaried employee
if the employer deducts from the employee's pay for absences caused
by the employer or by the operating requirements of the business.
If an employee is ready, willing, and able to work, deductions from
pay may not be made for time when work is not available. Therefore,
if an employer closes the office because of inclement weather or other
disasters for less than a full workweek, the employer must pay the
employee’s full salary even if the employer does not have a bona fide
benefits plan; the employee has no accrued benefits in the leave bank;
the employee has limited accrued leave benefits, and reducing that
accrued leave will result in a negative balance; or the employee already
has a negative balance in the accrued leave bank. If the private employer’s
offices remain open during inclement weather or other types of disasters,
exempt staff may be directed to take vacation or leave deductions
if they fail to report to work, without jeopardizing the employees’
exempt status. When the office is open, an exempt employee who has
no accrued benefits in the leave bank account does not have to be
paid for the full day(s) the employee fails to report to work because
of such circumstances as a heavy snow day. The DOL has stated that
employers, such as hospitals, that typically remain open for business
during weather emergencies and have a policy that does not allow employees
to use vacation or leave bank time when an employee chooses not to
report to work because of the adverse weather conditions may lawfully
deduct 1-full-day’s absence from the salary of such an exempt employee
without jeopardizing the employee's exempt status.
Jury duty/witness appearance/military
leave. Deductions may not be made for absences for jury
duty, attendance as a witness, or temporary military leave. The employer
may, however, offset any fees the employee receives as a juror or
witness or military pay for a particular week against the salary due
for that particular week without loss of the exemption.
Less than a full day. Exempt employees should never be docked for less than a full day
because to do so would require calculating an hourly wage.
Fines. Deductions
from the pay of exempt employees to cover the cost of damaged or lost
equipment are impermissible. The DOL has stated in an opinion letter
that employers may not fine exempt employees who lose or damage
equipment as a way around the ban on pay deductions for such costs.
Even out-of-pocket reimbursements would prevent employees from receiving
their predetermined salaries free and clear and would, therefore,
violate the salary basis requirement.
An employer that makes improper deductions from salary
will lose the exemption if the facts demonstrate that the employer
did not intend to pay the employees on a salary basis. According to
FLSA’s regulations, an actual practice of making improper deductions
demonstrates that the employer did not intend to pay employees on
a salary basis. The factors to consider when determining whether an
employer has an actual practice of making improper deductions include,
but are not limited to:
• The time period during which the employer made improper
deductions
• The number and geographic location of employees whose
salaries were improperly reduced
• The number and geographic location of managers responsible
for taking the improper deductions
• Whether the employer has a clearly communicated policy
permitting or prohibiting improper deductions
• The number of improper deductions, particularly as compared
to the number of employee infractions warranting discipline
If an employer has an actual practice of making improper
deductions from the pay of exempt employees, the employer will lose
the exemption for the entire class of employees in that job classification
who work for that manager. The FLSA regulations emphasize, though,
that improper deductions that are either isolated or inadvertent will
not result in loss of the exemption, as long as the employer reimburses
the employees for improperly deducting from their pay.
Safe-harbor rule. Whether a deduction
is permissible or impermissible will depend on the facts in the particular
case. If an employer has an actual practice of making improper deductions
from the pay of exempt employees, the employer will lose the exemption
for the entire class of employees in that job classification who work
for that manager. The FLSA regulations emphasize, though, that improper
deductions that are either isolated or inadvertent will not result
in loss of the exemption, as long as the employer reimburses the employees
for improperly deducting from their pay. The safe-harbor rule indicates
that an employer may prevent the loss of the exemption by:
• Having a clearly communicated policy, which includes
a complaint mechanism, that prohibits improper pay deductions
• Reimbursing employees for any improper deductions that
have occurred
• Making a good-faith commitment to comply with the regulations
in the future
But, if the employer willfully violates the policy by
continuing to make improper deductions after receiving employee complaints,
the exemption will be lost during the time period in which the improper
deductions were made. The FLSA regulations outline the best evidence
of a clearly communicated policy:
• A written policy
• Distributed to employees before the improper pay deductions
by providing a copy of the policy to employees at the time of hire;
publishing the policy in an employee handbook; publishing the policy
on the employer’s intranet